UML reverse engineering with Generics class/methods (#1614)

hi, I bring you an umpteenth bug (again!) concerning this time the way the generic methods are generated from Java code (I have not tested for other languages)

here 2 sample class:

public class Addition extends Paire {

public Addition(Object a, Object b) {

super(a, b);

// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub

}

public <T> Paire<T> accepter(Paire<T> v) {

return v;

}

}

and

public class Paire<T> {

T premier;

T second;

public Paire(T a, T b) {

premier = a;

second = b;

}

public T getPremier() {

return premier;

}

public T getSecond() {

return second;

}

}

the UML reverse engineering genere a empty class despite the correct syntax (I checked with eclipse)

here somme useful link:

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/java_generics.htm

files samples

https://tinyurl.com/r7qhbdh

I'm happy to use such powerful software but

frankly, I'm tired of discovering that version in version of new bugs .....

thank you for doing the neccessaire

Created
19 November 2019 16:42:07
Closed
13 December 2019 8:21:56
Requested by
fr016
State
Solved
Version
11.101
OperatingSystem
windows 10 x64
Solved in
12

Dusan Rodina - softwareideas.net 20 November 2019 21:46:31

Hi,

Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for these complications. The mentioned problems will be fixed soon.

TrackedRequestComment
Your Name:
You can use these formatting tags: [b]bold[/b] [i]italic[/i] [u]underline[/u] [url]www.example.com[/url] [code]some code[/code] [quote]quoted text[/quote] [list]one list item per line[/list]